Roundabout safety creates concern

The letter writer said he knowingly allowed vehicles to enter a wrong way lane

In the Sept. 19 issue of the North Thompson Times, Dan Quigley, project manager at Borrow Enterprises admitted he knowingly allowed vehicles to enter a wrong way lane, in other words, into head-on-traffic.  I would think the RCMP would have a problem with that.  He also stated that they were doing so when no vehicles were present.  It doesn’t matter if there were no vehicles present when your ‘Hazard Analysis’ was looking, it is an on coming traffic lane.  I have seen this happen when there were vehicles present. On different occasions my wife has seen this happen with other vehicles present, and other people we know have seen this happen with other vehicles present.  How anyone could allow people to drive into an oncoming traffic lane that has traffic coming from Wells Gray Park (in tourist season), Wyndhaven development, Greer development and several businesses, among others, is beyond comprehension, if not illegal.

He also states that these vehicles (that aren’t present) are going at a very low rate of speed and that the risk of a collision was very low and the probable severity would also be low.  What gives you the right to determine that the risk of a head on collision at any speed is acceptable?  Or does the ‘Hazard Analysis’ do that for you too?  By low probable severity do you mean just a few bruises, just a broken bone or two or just some minor spinal damage?  Or are you talking about the low probable severity of damage to the vehicles.  What is ‘low’ to you?  Three hundred dollars, $3,000 or $5,000?  Three hundred dollars could be a lot of money for retirees trying to live on pensions, or someone just starting out making minimum wage, etc, etc.  I guess if you are making good money $300 doesn’t sound like much, so it’s not important.

The whole approach to correcting this problem shows an arrogant and utter disregard to public safety.  Isn’t Public Safety what this Round About was all about to start with?

Patrick Stanley

Clearwater, B.C.

Just Posted

Back in Time

Historical Perspective

The story of Rotary Richard

People have until April 6 to make their guess

B.C. minister says rural internet is ‘railroad of the 21st century’

Jinny Sims talks details about the $50-million provincial and possible $750-million federal funds

Local contribution to a global issue

Global Climate Strike for Future

VIDEO: Can you believe it? This B.C. hill pulls cars backwards up a slope

Sir Isaac Newton had clearly never been to this Vernon anomaly when he discovered gravity

Canucks hang on for 7-4 win over Senators

Horvat nets 2 for Vancouver

European, Canadian regulators to do own review of Boeing jet

Air Canada plans to remove the Boeing 737 Max from its schedule at least through July 1

Prime minister defends Liberal budget measures as sales effort gets underway

Conservatives under Andrew Scheer say it’s a spree funded by borrowing against the future

Mayor meets with B.C. health minister on homeless taxi transfers

Two homeless people were discharged from Surrey Memorial and sent to a Chilliwack shelter

B.C. lottery winner being sued by co-workers

They claim he owes them $200,000 each, in a lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver

Teacher reprimanded for conduct towards special needs student

Alan Stephen Berry told vice principal he did not have time to use positive strategies

‘Full worm super moon’ to illuminate B.C. skies on first day of spring

Spring has sprung, a moon named in honour of thawing soil marks final super moon until 2020

Having phone within sight while driving does not violate law: B.C. judge

The mere presence of a cell phone within sight of a driver is not enough for a conviction, judge says

Most Read