Ontario’s Climate Action Plan undermines case for carbon pricing

Putting a price on CO2 production is the best way to reduce emissions but only if regulations and subsidies are eliminated

VANCOUVER, B.C. and CALGARY, Alta. / Troy Media/ – Proponents of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade schemes often defend their position on the grounds that simply attaching a “price” to carbon is the most economically efficient way to reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs). They argue it is less economically damaging to simply price pollution and let the market decide how emissions can be most cheaply reduced compared to a regulatory approach mandating specific emissions reductions.

And this argument is correct – in an economics textbook at least. In the real world, introducing a carbon pricing plan does not eliminate an apparently insatiable desire of governments to micromanage the economy in the name of environmental protection. Instead of carbon pricing replacing regulations, what we see is governments adding additional subsidies and regulations at the same time.

This is exactly what seems to be happening in Ontario. Recent news stories report Ontario is preparing to unveil a sweeping Climate Change Action Plan that would move Ontario’s energy markets further in the direction of central planning. The plan is reported to include a new slate of subsidies and command-and-control style regulations that would come atop the government’s recently announced cap-and-trade scheme. This combination would leave Ontario’s economy even more over-regulated and over-taxed.

Ontario’s government recently defended its new cap-and-trade plan by noting there is a “broad consensus that carbon pricing is the best tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” This is, again, in theory correct. But the reason carbon pricing is theoretically the best way to reduce emissions is that it should allow governments to eliminate the distortive regulations and subsidies they might otherwise use to reduce emissions.

But that’s not happening in Ontario. Instead, as the reporting on the government’s Climate Change Action Plan makes clear, the Wynne government is committed to adding another layer of regulation and subsidies on top of the new cap-and-trade plan.

Here are just a few examples. The climate change plan is reported to include $285 million in subsidies to encourage people to buy electric cars. The plan is also reported to call for new lower-carbon fuel standards for transportation fuels. In addition to its new subsidies and regulations, the plan apparently sets specific targets for transforming the province’s automobile fleet to the point that 12 per cent of all vehicles sold in 2025 will be electric vehicles.

These rules, subsidies, and specific targets represent precisely the type of economic micromanagement that carbon pricing is meant to eliminate the need for. The whole concept of emissions pricing is that, after setting the appropriate market price for carbon, there’s no need for central planners to fuss over what percentage of cars are fuelled by electricity. Those sorts of details are meant to be sorted out by price signals and the market.

But Ontario’s government is apparently unwilling to abide by the central economic theory behind carbon pricing and seems determined to press ahead with intrusive economic interventions. Ontario will wind up with higher taxes and more regulation and more distortive subsidies, a dangerous combination for the provincial economy.

In theory, replacing most environmental regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gases with an economy-wide carbon tax could make the economy more efficient. In reality, governments have proven unwilling to stop meddling in the economy after introducing carbon pricing and continue to enact new rules dictating what goods and services the economy should produce and how it ought to produce them. That’s what’s happening in Ontario, and the economic outcomes aren’t likely to be pretty.

 

– Ben Eisen is associate director of provincial prosperity studies and Kenneth P. Green is senior director of natural resource studies with the Fraser Institute.

 

 

Just Posted

Hwy. 5 closed south of Blue River due to ‘vehicle incident’

Social media reports say a semi-truck lost its load

This morning’s road conditions

Watch for slippery sections on much of Highway 5

Editor, The Times:

District of Clearwater invites local organizations to participate in Hockey Days

Playing Pickleball could just be your New Years resolution

By Judy Klontz Many people make a New Years resolution with good… Continue reading

Horsing around on skis

A skijoring practice is set for Jan. 19 at Smokin True Ranch

REPLAY: B.C’s best videos this week

In case you missed it, here’s a look at the replay-worth highlights from this week across the province

Patriots make 3rd straight Super Bowl, beat Chiefs 37-31 in OT

New England will meet L.A. Rams in NFL title game

Pettersson returns to lead Canucks to 3-2 win over Red Wings

Vancouver’s super rookie has 2 points in first game back after knee injury

Skaters stranded in Saint John, NB, amid storm on last day of championships

More than half of the flights out of the city’s airport were cancelled due to the weather

Call for tighter bail rules after Saudi sex-crime suspect vanishes

Mohammed Zuraibi Alzoabi was facing charges related to alleged sexual assault, criminal harassment, assault and forcible confinement of a woman

12 poisoned eagles found on Vancouver Island

Improper disposal of euthanized animal suspected

Olympic softball qualifier to be held in B.C.

Tournament is to be held Aug. 25 to Sept. 1

B.C. resident creates global sport training program

The 20 hour course teaches the science and application of interval training at the university level

B.C. VIEWS: Fact-checking the NDP’s speculation tax on empty homes

Negative-option billing is still legal for governments

Most Read